Neighbourhood Development Plan Working Group Meeting

8pm, Desford Library,  22 November 2016

 

In attendance:

Pat Crane, Martyn Randle (chair), David Crocker, Bernard Grimshaw, Jim Houghton, Scott Wakefield, Kaye Johnson, Ewan Lindsay, Linda Mitchell, Judy Sharpe, Sam Hatfield, Colin Crane,

 

Apologies:

Paul Angelinetta, Darren Tilley, Lyn Dearling, Adrian Dickinson, Julie Peel, Malcolm Peel, John Preston.

 

 

 

1. Welcome and Chairs Report:

The meeting opened at 8pm with Martyn Randle in the chair; Martyn welcomed all to the meeting including Sam Hatfield to his first meeting with us as the HBBC representative.

Martyns report covered:

Questionnaire

• Bernard and Pat have completed and circulated the first draft of the Questionnaire.
• Initial enquires into the costing for the printing, delivering and collecting the questionnaire are underway

As there will undoubtedly be further revisions before the final draft Questionnaire is agreed he strongly advises that a system of documentation control is created to keep track of:

1. Revision Levels
2. Recipients

 

Website

At present two Quotes have been received and one is pending, but discuss this later in the meeting.

 

Martyn also suggested it would be a good idea for an update to go out to the parish, perhaps in the graphic? (BG/LM to arrange).

 

2. Minutes:

The minutes of the last meeting were read out and agreed as a true copy, and signed by the chair.

 

3. Matters arising not on the Agenda:

Only matters arising were that Kaye reminded all if a sub group meets please can she have a copy of the notes for the files and to be submitted with the agenda for the next full meeting.

 

4. Treasurer’s report:

Darren was unfortunately unable to attend due to health reasons, but Martyn advised everyone that there was no change in the financial circumstances since last time.   Colin did add here that the Parish Council have agreed to carry forward this year’s precept if we don’t use it to next year, we won’t lose it.

 

5. Communications Officers report – Website:

Bern spoke about the report which he had circulated, which mainly covered the

Website and questionnaire – the questionnaire part to be discussed later.  Bernard

said that 3 quotations had been received on a common basis and meetings held with 2 companies who had   requested them. He and Colin were in agreement that we propose CFS to the Parish Council as the company we wish to use to provide the web site.   Scott asked what had impressed them so much about CFS, Colin

said that Craig had taken the time to sit with them and explain items in full, with questions and

answers both ways.  Jim said they use CFS for S.I.D. and Craig is very proactive.  David C said

he has used Craig and found him to be very proactive.     The Chair approved the proposal of

CFS and this is to be put to the PC at their December meeting.    There will need to be

arrangements for the administration of the site going forward and the coordinating group will take this on.

The three companies who have quoted, PD Solutions, 2commune and CFS to be notified of the

Successful tender after the PC Decision.

 

7. Focus Groups:

The chair thanked all involved in meeting as the sub groups and asked that everyone there had received

copies of the notes from the focus groups with the agenda.  All agreed and this led on to the Questionnaire

discussion.

 

8.  Draft 0 of the questionnaire has been sent out to all on the main list and David Crocker asked Bernard if he had

received any feed back from  the RCC, HBBC or MRH. Sam Hatfield apologised and said he had only received it a couple of days prior and not had the time to read fully.  He will however prioritise this and get back with any comments.     Martyn pointed out that this is only a draft copy and must be treated as such.  It was suggested that the housing survey be moved to the end and perhaps on a different colour paper so that the residents know which part is to be returned to whom.   It was discussed at length as to if a collection will be needed if they aren’t returned and also what process is to be used to clarify just who and who had not returned them.

It was also discussed as to if we want a young person questionnaire to be sent to be adopted.  This was agreed yes, and Colin Crane has agreed to run the youth project.

David Crocker suggested that the introduction pages need shortening to grab the residents’ attention, including relevant pictures as required.

It was also suggested that the wording Desford Parish be amended to the Parish of Desford and explain just how the parish is made up.

Everyone was asked to read draft 0 and send any suggestions asap.

Bernard said he was waiting for approval from this meeting tonight and will then visit the MRH in Coalville to discuss the housing survey in more detail.

The question was asked if the housing part is for all houses or just rented and perhaps should have its own short introduction:  it is for all properties.

Other comments re draft 0:

It needs reducing in length overall and some parts seem rather political.

Needs to be in more plain English

Sections 15 and 23 are the same subject

Take out “to be” where it isn’t needed, ie see section 26.

Take out the DOB question and replace with age group boxes.

Do we want to offer a prize draw incentive to encourage the completion of the form, if so can we use local business’s to donate gifts?

IT was agreed to collate any feedback from this group and other organisations and make draft 1, then to have a sub group meeting to discuss the amended form further.   Draft 1 hopefully to be circulated over the Christmas break in time for the next meeting.

The co-ordinating sub group will make recommendations to the group to finalise the content, format, printing arrangements, distribution, collection, analysis and reporting in liaison with HBBC, RCC, MRH.

 

9. AOB:

No further business

 

10. Next meeting 5^th January 2017 at 7.30pm in Desford Library.

 

Meeting closed 9.20pm.

 

 

 

I confirm this is a true copy of the meeting.

 

Signed……………………………………   Name………………………………………………..

 

Date…………………………………………

 

Neighbourhood Development Plan Working Group Meeting

7.30pm Desford Library 27 September 2016

 

In attendance: Martyn Randle, Darren Tilley, Paul Angelinetta, Pat Crane, David Crocker, Bernard Grimshaw, Jim Houghton, Scott Wakefield, Kaye Johnson, Ewan Lindsay, Malcolm Peel, Judy Sharpe, Kay Smith,

 

 

1. Martyn welcomed all to the meeting and asked for the apologies:

Apologies given from:  Terry Satchwell, Joe Scarratt, John Preston, Janet & Derek Ireland, Lyn Dearling, Adrian Dickinson, Ena & Tom Kirkman, Linda Mitchell, Julie Peel.

 

Martyn said that on the whole we are doing well but might not quite meet all the targets we have set.  He confirmed that Linda has sent a press release to the Graphic for their October edition explaining to all about the forthcoming questionnaire. Martyn also confirmed that the focus groups are all up and running and he has sent out a draft template for the groups to consider using.  After discussion it was agreed that the template will be used AFTER the questionnaire results have been collated.

 

2. The minutes of the last meeting were discussed and approved as a true copy, and signed by Martyn.

 

3. There were no matters arising.

 

4. Treasurer’s report: Darren said nothing had been spent since the last meeting so the balance still remained the same.  The Parish Council had put £5 000 in the budget for last year and £5 000 for this year.  Darren did remind the group that the locality grant should be considered and applied for, for large funding expense rather than using our own budget.

 

5. Communication officers report: Bernard apologised, but with holidays and a family funeral    since the last meeting, he had sent out the latest edition of the Project Plan, but there really was nothing for him to report back on this time

 

6. Bernard did confirm that he and Colin Crane are still looking to get the quotes in for the web page site now that they have a criteria specification for all 3 companies to quote on a ‘like for like’ basis. It was agreed that the website does need to be live before the questionnaire goes out to the residents.

 

7. Focus Groups: The minutes from focus groups meetings that have been held since our last WG meeting were discussed.  The next meetings for them are:

HHH  – 15^th October

T&T  – TBA

E,F,OS,R,RE – 10^TH October

F,S,E,E,  –  12^TH October

Co – ord – 26^th October

Can the notes from these meetings please be sent to the secretary (Kaye) to be included with the agenda email for the next meeting?

Once all the questions have been agreed within the actual focus groups, they need to be sent to the Co-ordination group to check through them and come up with the final list.

 

8. The system to be used to raise the questionnaire was debated, Pat has emailed out 4 questionnaires used by other villages to hopefully help us with ours. It was suggested that more press releases be issued as to why to complete the questionnaire and Scott offered to assist Linda with this.

 

9. AOB – only one issue raised by Kaye. She advised that the names on the attendance list who neither attend nor offer apologies have now been asked twice if they still wish to be included and no one has actually confirmed either way.  The question being do we still need to include these residents on the email listing?  Yes was the answer and after discussion as to if it should just be the minutes or everything, it was agreed to just keep sending everything out.

 

10. Next meeting to be held on November 22 at Desford Library, but Note the starting time for this one to be 8pm.

 

Meeting closed 8.21pm.

 

 

I confirm these are a true copy of the minutes for this meeting………………………………..

 

Date ………………………………………

 

 

 

 

NDPWG Meeting 23 August 2016

7pm Botcheston Village Hall

 

In Attendance:

Martyn Randle(chair), Pat Crane, Bernard Grimshaw, Darren Tilley, Paul Angelinetta, David Crocker, Jim Houghton, Scott Wakefield, Kaye Johnson, Linda Mitchell, Julie Peel, Malcolm Peel, Judy Sharpe, Kay Smith, Janet Ireland, Derek Ireland, Colin Crane,  GUEST: Richard Mugglestone from Midland Rural Housing.

 

 

2. Martyn welcomed everyone to the meeting and asked for apologies:

John Preston, Andy Killip, Joe Scarratt, Terry Satchwell, Lyn Dearling, Adrian Dickinson, Ena & Tom Kirkman, Ewan   Lindsay.

Martyn said there was no chairman’s report for this meeting and went on to introduce our guest Richard Mugglestone who was here to talk to us about his proposed housing Needs Survey.

 

1    Richard Mugglestone introduced himself from the Midland Rural Housing group (MRH), based in Leicestershire and said their work involves the rural communities where there is a need for housing for local people in villages:

I.E. grown up children looking to leave their parents’ house and set up their own home, AND / OR people working in an area and want to move there AND/OR relatives of local people who need to move nearer.

The MRH work with   local councils and housing associations to research where properties are needed and can be built at an affordable price.   The first step to achieve this is a housing needs survey to engage with the village.

 

Hinckley and Bosworth have already asked MRH to do housing surveys in certain areas, including Desford, and this can be linked in with the NDP to give one joint questionnaire with no extra cost to the NDP group.

Before being sent out the Housing Need Survey needs to be publicised through means such as the publications and posters etc.  The survey then goes out with a covering letter explaining what it is and why it is needed. The 1^st & 3^rd sections are the most important covering:

What type of houses are needed?

Are people moving in the next 5 years, if so to what type of property?

The market housing needs?

 

The answers from the questionnaire are then analysed by the MRH and sent both to the council and the NDP.

(A prepaid envelope is provided to all and they usually get a 30% plus response rate).   The results from this can be used as evidence for the NDP and may help to justify affordable homes for local people on land that would not normally get PP, eg – for a mixture of rented and shared ownership should it be deemed necessary.

 

Pat explained that Desford Parish also covers Botcheston, Newtown Unthank and Kirby Grange.  Kirby Grange is mostly bungalows but Desford itself needs more bungalows.  If just one survey is done will the number of bungalows at Kirby Grange reflect on the need for Desford itself?

Richard answered that this could perhaps be overcome by doing 3 separate surveys, Newtown Unthank, Botcheston/Kirby Grange and Desford.

 

Richard did say at this stage that their current contract with the HBBC finishes on 31 March 2017, so if we wanted a joint questionnaire we must get our side sorted for the joint questionnaire to go out before this date.   He said it normally takes 3-4 weeks to get the forms back and then approx. another 3 weeks to analyse the answers.  He will send a copy of a joint questionnaire that they have already used.

 

Pat asked if the questionnaire results can have any influence to/on the housing targets set by HBBC.  Richard said that whilst HBBC have targets for the borough, a village can show local needs by these results.

Richard was asked if any other local parish have done a joint survey, he said only 1; others had used the MRH survey results to feed into their NDP.

It was asked if this questionnaire is paper driven only, or is there web access?  At this stage only paper forms are sent out, the MRH have found that people don’t necessarily open unknown emails.

 

At this stage Richard was thanked for his attendance and time given.

 

3. Everyone were asked if they had received and read a copy of the minutes from the last meeting, it was a positive acknowledgement and with no issues the chair signed as a true copy.

 

4. Just one matter arising, Kaye was asked to explain what PP meant in a paragraph in section 8 of the minutes… Kaye explained it was planning permission.

 

5. Darren explained the spreadsheet that was sent out prior to the meeting (copy attached).

 

6. Bernard explained that the main topic of his report is the website which is under another heading, but did say that each focus group now had members and meetings had commenced. Linda said she is doing an article for the Graphic letting all residents know about these groups.

 

7. A group discussion took place regarding Richard’s presentation earlier, it was suggested that focus groups organise their own sections and we need to be ready for the questionnaire to go out January 2017 at the latest.

After lengthy discussions, Darren proposed that we go with the joint questionnaire and Scott seconded this motion, the rest of the group were in favour.

 

8. Martyn has emailed out guidance notes for all focus groups to use. Two groups have met, one has arranged a date to meet and the other has to organise a first meeting. (Meeting notes in file)

History Heritage and Housing, – the housing side can be met from the questionnaire, the history and heritage need to be discussed further.

Traffic and transport – We need to consider what impact Neovia development will have on traffic in Desford, also any future housing developments will have impact on traffic movement.    It was suggested that HBBC be contacted to ask how any breach of traffic covenants in granted planning permissions can be policed.

Dangerous road junctions need to be included, along with questions such as do we need better cycle routes etc in the village.

It was agreed that the focus groups need to raise open questions with no misleading phrases contained within them.

 

9. The cost received from PD solutions is far too expensive, a request for another quote has been sent to CFS. Colin said a company called 2commune are doing the Desford PC site and he & Bernard will (ask the clerk to) get a quote from them as well.   Darren will need the 3 quotes to be able to apply for a locality grant to assist.  After discussion it was agreed that those 3 will be asked, but on the understanding that they must be comparable.  Bernard has drawn a specification of what they will be asked to quote against.   Once we have agreed on the company, this can be passed to the PC as our preferred choice.

 

10. No more business – meeting closed at 9pm.

Next meeting 27 September, 7.30pm Desford Library.

 

 

Signed as a true copy of the meeting………………………………………………………..  Date………………………………………

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

NDPWG meeting 25th July 2016

7.30 pm, Desford Library

 

 

In attendance: Martyn Randle (chair), Pat Crane, Darren Tilley, Bernard Grimshaw, Paul Angelinetta, David Crocker, Jim Houghton, Scott Wakefield, Kaye Johnson, Ewan Lindsay, Linda Mitchell, Julie Peel, Malcolm Peel, Judy Sharpe, Kay Smith, John Preston.  Guests:  Colin Crane, John Pope.

 

 

1. Apologies – Lyn Dearling, Joe Scarratt, Peter Walker, Andy Killip.

A welcome was given to all in attendance, and everyone introduced themselves in turn around the table.

Chairman’s report:

Martyn announced that the stakeholder’s event was well attended and gave thanks to John Preston for his all his help in making it run smoothly.  Martyn also thanked Desford Academy for allowing the event to take place in their premises.   He went onto say that we are on target with our work and are up to milestone 4 already.  But we now need to be setting up the focus groups to continue on course.

 

2. Everyone was asked if they had received the minutes for the last meeting, which all agreed, and were approved as a true records.
3. There were no matters arising.

 

4. Treasurer’s report:

Darren said that other than £12.98 which had been spent on items for the stakeholders meeting, (ie tea, coffee etc) the financial situation was still the same as the last meeting.

5. Communication officer’s report:

Pat and Bernard attended a LCC event which was very useful and of which Bern has already circulated details to all on the list.

There will need to be a Sustainability Assessment once proposals start to become formulated.  We are unlikely to need a Strategic Environmental Assessment. Bern will ascertain the steps involved and circulate them in due course.

A housing and economic assessment for Leicester, Leics and Rutland:  Bern attended this seminar on the 27 June, sadly HBBC were not represented, but colleagues from Market Bosworth were and a useful contact or two from LCC. Bern found out that GL Hearn, planning consultants, had been engaged by a range of authorities and bodies to carry out such an assessment over 2 years to 2018.

It is to set the scene for the upcoming reviews of county and district plans well into the 2020s, if this new survey highlights differences, neighbourhood plans will have to take account of them.  HBBC will liaise close with P.Cs preparing plans.  Data will be passed on where appropriate.

 

6. Guest: John Pope is from the Market Bosworth NDP.  He said it is now 10 months since their referendum and the ongoing implementation is perhaps even more work now.

M.B. were on a learning curve doing their NDP and covered just two main areas, Building and Development AND Character and Environment.

Our group must remember there is a lot of data to collect and subsequently collate. The questionnaire needs to be thought through and the main criteria is not to fall into the trap of no evidence = no policy.    A lot of items were highlighted after the questionnaire and they wish they could have gone back and done it again.  Don’t Rush was the important factor here.   One problem is that if we keep asking residents their interest will wane; take time and get it right.

When it comes to the policies, keep them simple and most importantly think of the actual wording –he gave 2 examples of such a problem in M.B. that could have been avoided if the wording was correct.   Questions were then asked to John Pope:

Q – Re the questionnaire – Did it cover all their parish and how did residents respond?

A –Yes and 50% response to a 12 page questionnaire, which also included a £25 prize draw to encourage returns via either the internet or hard copies.    Also suggested that we write articles in local magazines (ie Graphic), as well as emails etc., to show the outcome of both the consultation events and to keep feedback going to those interested.

Q – What is evidence, do we need practical evidence such as HBBC info?

A –   Depends on policies chosen.  The local NDP cannot hope to solve all infrastructure issues, suggested to look at other village policies to get ideas but must have evidence to back Desford’s answers.

Q – Consultants- would MB engage them again to do the writing?

A – If independent consultant collects the info, they are just that INDEPENDENT, correct evidence there.   A software company in MB collected the info but MBNDP did the analysis.

Remember to formulate your questionnaire based on how you intend to analyse the data.

Q – Have you kept a list of what you wish you had have asked in the questionnaire?

A – Yes, hopefully can forward them on.  And remember you can’t ask leading questions to the answers you would like, use independent company to give credibility.

Q – Were the returned forms biased in the age groups?

A – difficult to say because one form was given to each house, but also allow for a request for more if individuals in that home want to complete themselves rather than jointly.   Also offer help from one of the NDPWG to assist with the completion if someone can’t write the answers themselves.  MB also involved the schools and guides to get the children to ask parents / grandparents to complete, after all it’s to cover their futures as well.

It was agreed here that the NDPWG need to visit groups in the village to do this.

Q – How many houses in MB Parish

A – 968 with an approx. population of 2700 – Desford Parish is approx. double this.

Q – MB had a website to list all communication, was this set up by a professional at a cost?

A – Yes by a company in Swan House, and ongoing costs to keep this going should be covered by the grants they received.

Q – How many were on the MBNDP group?

A – 12 including 2 PC, 8 of whom are still listed and 6 of these are active.

 

John was thanked for his very helpful input into the meeting and left at 8.15 along with Colin Crane.

 

7. Focus Groups:

Bern has already emailed out a list of the groups with willing volunteers, 3 additional people also volunteered tonight, Judy, Paul and Ewan. Bern said there were now enough names to each group for meetings to start, however, not too late to add more people if they are interested.  It was suggested that an advert be made to ask for volunteers, and to start with the list that Pat has of people who asked to be kept up to date with proceedings.

The groups are to be:  History, Heritage & Housing; Traffic & Transport; Environment, Flooding, Open Spaces, Recreation & Renewable Energy; Facilities, Services, Educations, Employment & Economy.   Each group to have its own chair and scribe.

 

8. Stakeholder event:

John Preston categorised who was invited, attended and apologised this event, together with information from the evening.  A report has been issued giving all these details and this must be included as part of the evidence.   The key points were summarised onto an A4 sheet and handed out to all at the meeting.   Questions were then asked to John Preston:

Q – How can we include things like transport issues that come under highways?

A – Communication needed with highways.

Q – There is a potential HSE issue for damage to the street furniture, how does a policy get raised?

A – Improvements to the footpath / road junction need to be evidenced to be designed into the policy.

Q- A stakeholder said that based on the way vehicular traffic is increased vastly with one employer by 2036 Desford will be gridlocked, can vehicle movement be part of the plan?

A – (By Pat) this will be part of the evidence when we say building only to be in certain parts of the village.

 

An employer in the village was discussed, who have advised the PC that they are looking to increase their buildings vastly, which will in turn increase employment, but this could add to additional housing needed and vehicle movement increasing.  The PP that will be being submitted will need to be allowed for in the NDP.

Pat Crane thanked John for his invaluable help with the Stakeholders report and said it is now down to the focus groups to discuss further.

 

John Preston said those in attendance at the stakeholders meeting did want to see the outcome of the meeting, and as the report is a public document this should be emailed out to all concerned. JP to send this out as an email link, once confirmation has been received from Neovia and the doctors that they are happy for their future pp to be made public.

 

A discussion then took place between the group as to how is the best way to keep the parish residents informed, ie postcards to all, adverts in local mags or emails etc…   An advert in the local Graphic, publicise on social media and posters around the village were agreed on plus emails to all on Pat’s list.  Scott asked who would be responsible for this and it was agreed that Bern is the communications officer, who will willingly put the info together, but then will need help with the social media side.  Linda offered to help with the article for the Graphic.  Pat will laminate and put up posters.  A costing is to be obtained by Bern for the social media help from the company (Gareth Bromby) at Market Bosworth.

 

9. AOB – None.

 

10. Next meeting – there is already a meeting to be held at Botcheston Village Hall on the 23^rd August at 7pm with Richard Mugglestone attending who is an expert on housing need surveys. It was agreed to hold a WG meeting immediately after.

September meeting to be on Tuesday 27^th at 7.30pm at Desford Library.

 

Meeting Closed at 9.15pm

 

 

I confirm this is a true record of the meeting…………………………………………………………..

 

Date ………………………………………………………….

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Desford Neighbourhood Development Plan Working Group

Minutes of meeting 06.06.16.

Present: Martyn Randle (Chair), Paul Angelinetta, Pat Crane, David Crocker, Adrian Dickinson, Bernard Grimshaw, Jim Houghton, Linda Mitchell, Julie Peel, Malcolm Peel, Joe Scarratt, Darren Tilley, Scott Wakefield

In attendance: John Preston

Apologies: Lyn Dearling, Kaye Johnson, Judy Sharpe, Kay Smith, Peter Walker

1. Chairman’s Report: The Open Events had gone well. Thanks to JP for his report, although not everyone had had time to read it in detail yet.  First thoughts were that we will need sub-groups to look at specific topics

 

2. Minutes: The minutes of 12.04.16. were signed as a true record

 

3. Matters Arising: none

 

4. Treasurer’s Report: Expenditure: £166.88. Balance: £83.12 (see attached). Thanks were expressed to SW for obtaining the voucher from Pesto foc.  Pesto had been thanked and acknowledged at the Carnival

 

5. Consultation Report:

General comments:

• JP suggested that sub-groups will need to look at the results under the different headings, the feedback from the stakeholder meeting plus any evidence gathered. Consideration of all these sources of information will be used to inform our policies
• It was good to note that people offered suggestions; not all criticism
• Some issues raised can be referred to the Parish Council as they fall within their remit
• It was good to give people 3 opportunities to have their say. The weather may have affected attendance
• JP provided the contact details of those who wish to be kept informed about the NDP.  A database will be created
• The demographics show that all but 4 of the attendees were over 55 and none were below 35 (see discussion below)
• We need to consider how we engage people from other age groups and geographical areas not represented. The stakeholder meeting and questionnaire will pick up some different people
• It is important to keep people informed through articles in the media and social media

 

The Results:

• Traffic & Transport attracted the most comments, which was not surprising
• There was considerable interest in Renewable Energy
• Facilities were generally thought to be good
• Housing revealed a demand for bungalows, which reflects the demographics of the attendees
• Only 3 people expressed their vision for the parish, so this needs to be worked on
• Comments under each heading could be grouped together and filtered

 

Attracting younger people:

• SW suggested we need to piggy back onto events where there are younger people, such as Open Mic Night at SiD, the Village Quiz. We could ask for 5 minutes to explain why they should care about the future of the place where they live and their children will grow up
• Another suggestion is for us to visit the different groups that meet in the parish and talk to them
• JH offered to contact all the sports clubs and ask them to disseminate the message
• We do the same for the young people’s organisations, mums & toddlers, the PTA – any volunteers?
• This needs to be done in parallel with our ongoing work, in the hope that there will be a greater public awareness by the time the questionnaire is issued
• PC will ask Peter Walker if he would be prepared to set up a facebook page. DPC is about to set one up, but it was felt that we need a snappy title to attract people to visit.  We need to ask the administrators of other facebook pages to add a link to ours
• We may pick up new issues from the above actions

 

6. Communications Officer’s Report:

• BG & PC attended a NDP Network meeting at County Hall. BG will summarise the papers and circulate
• The next task is to ask HBBC if we need a Strategic Environment Assessment (SEA) or Sustainability Assessment (SA). BG will contact Andy Killip

 

7. Project Plan: (previously circulated)

There is a lot to do in the coming month

• Analyse the Consultation Report
• Organise the Stakeholder Event then look at the results
• Evaluate all the information
• Engage with schools
• Set up focus groups to look at the various topics (see AOB). It was suggested that each group aims to co-opt a younger person
• Encourage people on the extended mailing list to join focus groups, but they should be chaired by a member of the WG
• Start preparing the Questionnaire: BG suggested this should be ready by October, so that in November we will have had them returned and be able to draft our vision and get an idea of what consultants we might need to engage
• The Project Plan sub-group will coordinate the above process

 

8. Open Events sub-group: this had not met since the Open Events, but will meet to organise the Stakeholder Event (see below)

 

9. Understudies for officers: It was felt that most of the officers could send a report by e mail if they were unable to attend. In the absence of the Secretary or Chair, substitutes can be nominated on an ad hoc basis

 

10. Stakeholder Event:

 

• Tuesday 5^th July at Bosworth Academy
• After discussion, it was agreed to keep to the suggested time of 5.45 for a 6pm start
• PC & Julie P have compiled a list of groups/organisations/shops/businesses and any updates need to be sent to JP
• AK will be asked to contact any businesses not on our list
• JS has almost completed a list of landowners (PC to send her list)
• Statutory authorities and service providers will also be invited
• JP will circulate the standard RCC invitation
• JP will send them out later this week (as soon as approved) or next week (as soon as the information about landowners is passed to him). A reminder will be sent nearer the date
• If we feel there are key stakeholders who have not replied, we can contact them ourselves
• JP provided a draft Agenda for the Stakeholder Meeting
• We will decide whether to have mixed or category based groups for the workshop when we see who is coming
• A facilitator and scribe will be needed for each table (suggest 5)
• JP will provide a grid of the key issues. The aim is to discuss constraints & opportunities (see attached facilitators brief)
• Confidentiality was raised. It was felt that some businesses will be reluctant to disclose plans for the future.  Separate meetings can be arranged at other times if requested
• A meeting of the facilitators was set for Tuesday 28^th June 6.30 at the library
• The following volunteered: PA, DC, PC, BG, JH, LM, MR, DT, SW
• KS will be asked if she is willing to be the 10^th volunteer

 

11. AOB:

• Focus Groups:

After discussion, the following groupings were agreed, but this does not preclude discussion about other topics.  There will be plenary sessions when the outcomes of the groups’ work are shared

• Heritage, History & Housing
• Traffic & Transport
• Environment, Flooding, Open Spaces, Recreation & Renewable Energy
• Facilities, Services, Education, Employment & Economy

 

• People can be on more than one focus group, so meetings will need to be carefully timetabled
• BG will coordinate the groups. About 4 members would be a good number per group.  Those on the extended mailing list will be invited to join
• BG will produce a set of draft Terms of Reference for the focus groups

 

• It was suggested that we invite someone from another NDP group to share their experience. It was agreed to invite a representative from Market Bosworth to our next meeting

 

• Locality grant: the timing of an application is difficult. We are not ready to identify what consultants we need, but once decided, we have to allow time to get quotes, find out their availability etc.  Any grant awarded in the autumn would need to be spent by March 31^st

 

• JP will talk to Richard Mugglestone about a Housing Needs Survey

 

Date of next meeting: Monday 25^th July 7.30pm at the library

 

 

 

Desford Neighbourhood Development Plan Working Group

Meeting 12 April 2016.

7.30pm  Desford Library

 

In attendance:  Martyn Randle(Chair), Pat Crane, David Crocker, Bernard Grimshaw, Jim Houghton, Janet Ireland, Derek Ireland, Kaye Johnson, Ewan Lindsay, Malcolm Peel, Darren Tilley.

ALSO  Helen Nightingale from HBBC.

 

1. Apologies were given from Pat Barnes, Ray Barnes, Lyn Dearling, Linda Mitchell, Julie Peel, Joe Scarratt, Judy Sharpe, Steve Thorpe,

The Chairman, Martyn , gave his report as follows:

Introduction

The purpose of a Neighborhood Development Plan (NDP) Working Group is to establish general planning policies in partnership with the local community and Parish Council for the future development and use of land in a Parish.

 

Desford Neighborhood Development Working Group

The purpose of the Working Group is to establish general planning policies in partnership with the local community and Parish Council for the future development and use of land in Desford Parish (Desford, Botcheston and Newtown Unthank).

 

The working group is required to take into account the needs of the residents of Desford Parish and the strategic policies of the Borough council’s Local Plan 2006 – 2026 and be supported by proportionate robust evidence.  Essentially the strategy of the working group is to research into both the village community and the County Councils wants and needs. Make impartial judgements on what is “want” (desirable) and a need (essential) and produce a questionnaire for the residents of Desford Parish. The responses to the questionnaire will form the basis of a draft Neighborhood Development Plan (NDP) for Desford Parish Council.

 

Funding

Grants are available for Neighborhood Development Schemes and applications for grants are being made to both the Department for Communities and Local Government and Desford Parish Council.

 

Operational Strategy

Given the size and complexity involved in developing a NDP two sub-committees have been set up to

1. a) Develop a project plan
2. b) Plan open events to publicize the work of the NDP

 

Draft Project Plan

A time line has been established and 7 milestones have been identified

 

Open Events

A publicity flyer has been designed and three open events have been organized.

 

2. Minutes of Last Meeting.

Unfortunately several committee members failed to receive the email of the minutes of the last meeting. The Chairman went quickly through the minutes with all in attendance and were approved and signed as a true copy.

3. Matters arising:

No 9 on the minutes, it has been confirmed that some drop in events have now been organized as per the Chairman’s report.

4. Treasurers Report: Darren explained the expenses and income spreadsheet which had been circulated before the meeting.  At the moment there is £5k in the fund.  Darren asked that he is advised well in advance of any expenditure required so that he can budget accordingly.   Evidence will be required, ie quotes etc, to obtain the actual monies, followed by the receipted invoices.  It was suggested that one person be responsible within the group for the purse strings, and this was agreed with Darren being the obvious choice.   Malcolm said that all purchases should go through the PC Resources committee, but Bernard pointed out that the Clerk to the PC can authorize small purchases.  Locality Grant application – this is going through the motions and awaiting expenditure estimates to be able to submit the application later this year. Darren advised that grant monies do have to be spent within 6 months of receiving them, but if we need the money for this autumn to spend, we must be getting our application in asap.   The question was asked how much the RCC would require to engage them, at this stage we are unsure but John is now back from Australia and should be contacted asap to answer this; he does have some hours allocated to the HBBC and they are willing to allow the NDPGW a small percentage of this.

 

5. Communication officer report:  Bernard said he had been in touch with Helen at HBBC and she had been extremely helpful with the area maps (emailed before the meeting to all) and information given, hence asking her to attend tonight’s meeting to assist further.

 

6. Project Plan: There really wasn’t a report to give as such, Bernard said the info received from Helen was an excellent start for the group.

 

7. Open Events: There are 3 events planned covering day and evening to allow as many as want to attend to do so.  Friday 6^th May at Botcheston village Hall, 17.00 – 19.00, Saturday 7^th May St Martins Church Centre 10.30 – 14.30  and  Tues 10^th May at Desford Library 16.00 – 20.00.

Posters are ready to go up and flyers are designed, just awaiting on the green light for the expense from the PC at their next meeting.   A flyer is to go to each house, business and farm in the Parish wherever possible. Pat has a list of all businesses and groups in the parish to email a copy to.  Helen said she couldn’t confirm the business names and addresses, but if Pat lets her have a copy of the list she will cross check to the councils list.  If the council hold more details, we can supply the council with the information for them to send out on our behalf, they cannot supply us with details under the data protection rules.   Leaflets need to go out w/c 25 April and help is needed for this.  The old saying many hands make light work!     John from RCC will help with the display needed for the consultation events, but if anyone has any photos that can help please supply them.      Helen asked if there is a questionnaire to be completed, but at this stage Pat said no just feedback, any questions and the public’s views/issues at this time.  Dave suggested an email address be added to the leaflets for any questions.   Bernard is to contact the Leicester Mercury and the Hinckley times re the leaflet drop.

 

8. Helen explained the maps that she gave the link to, (copies of the map sent out before the meeting electronically to all), HBBC monitor how many dwellings have been built since 2009 to ensure they meet the minimum requirement. The highlighted areas on the maps show where people have shown an interest for possible building on their land.  3 main items are considered – Suitable, available and developable.  All villages have a village settlement boundary and development is not allowed outside of this if not sustainable. Helen agreed to send a link to the group so people can check details on these maps.   If we want HBBC to write to the landowners on these maps to let Helen know.

A question was raised about light industry – is this something that would be approved? Answer was if there is a need then would have to be allocated, sites have to be assessed for employment and dwellings.   Once planning has been completed the highlighting is removed from the area on the map.

Helen was asked about access / traffic consideration, she said access is reviewed initially and as to be tested before planning is considered.   It was pointed out that by having a NDP it gives a village a good strong point for focusing development and not a free for all for the builders.

HBBC can help with questionnaires etc. should the help be needed,  ie, the population growth and housing growth for the area can be supplied if required.   Based on the 2014 projections 450 homes per year are currently required to meet the HBBC area requirements.  Bern suggested that a need for housing survey will be required by professionals later this year.  After giving us all the information Helen advised us that she starts her maternity leave at the end of May but Andy Killip will cover until she returns next year.

 

9. Desford Carnival: The NDP are to have a stand at the carnival with the full display again, just to encourage more people to have their say.

 

10. Next Steps: A group is needed to collate replies received from the initial consultations so that a suitable questionnaire can be drafted.   Bernard and Pat to do this with Dave and Jim.

Helen suggested that if people didn’t want to give their names and addresses, but give their feedback anonymously at the initial consultations perhaps a pinboard idea might be useful; all they have to do is put a pin on the map provided to show which area of the parish they live in.

 

11. AOB: Darren asked Pat if meetings of sub groups required true minutes keeping, Pat is going to investigate this.

Helen at HBBC to be included in the minutes of all meetings.

Pat and Ray Barnes have sent their apologies but wish to resign from the committee due to other commitments, but will assist with leaftlet dropping etc where they can.

 

12. Next meeting: 6 June 2016 at 7.30pm at Desford Library.  Kaye asked for her apologies to be accepted now for this as she will be on holiday.

 

I confirm this is a true record of the above meeting:

Signed…………………………………………………………………….   Name……………………………………………… Date…………………………